Identity & perimeter
Legal entities, facilities, owners, operators, names, and addresses—resolved into the footprint supported for the relevant date.
Talon Deal Truth Check
A five-day, fixed-scope decision-infrastructure service for healthcare private-equity teams, lenders, corporate-development teams, MSOs, and payers. Talon tests one target’s story against available external records and delivers a Decision Posture for human review—before the LOI, the data room, and the full diligence spend.
The pre-diligence gap
Seller materials are designed to tell a coherent story. Talon asks whether the available external record tells the same one.
The method
Talon uses the Concinna evidence layer to reconcile available healthcare evidence across entities and time—then focuses on what does not agree. Depending on the target and source availability, that may include CMS Hospital Cost Reports, CMS public provider-enrollment files derived from PECOS, NPPES, CMS Provider Data Catalog records, state licensure and facility records, public payer-rate disclosures, quality and enforcement records, and relevant public credit or transaction disclosures.
What the target says.
What available evidence supports.
What fails to reconcile across time.
What management must prove next.
What Talon can see before the data room
Depending on the target and available sources, Talon can reconstruct the following—then show exactly where the reconstruction breaks.
Legal entities, facilities, owners, operators, names, and addresses—resolved into the footprint supported for the relevant date.
Openings, closures, acquisitions, dispositions, enrollment, and licensure events—sequenced across time.
Available cost-report revenue, operating income, margin, beds, occupancy, utilization, and payer mix—with filing status and vintage attached.
Scale, margin, occupancy, quality, and payer-dependence benchmarks against a relevant healthcare peer set.
Quality ratings, safety signals, sanctions, civil penalties, settlements, and monitoring events—where available records support them.
Published payer rates, Medicaid methodologies, directed-payment programs, and regulatory changes that could alter the economics.
Ratings, debt disclosures, maturities, ownership changes, transaction history, and known process signals from available filings.
Source publication date, record vintage, contradictions, inaccessible evidence, and the exact questions the public record cannot close.
Every material finding has a status. Supported. Limited. Contradicted. Unresolved. Not observed.
Illustrative evidence scope. Availability and currency vary by target, setting, geography, and source.What the service actually delivers
Not a data dump. A dated finding, its evidence status, why it matters, and the exact question management must answer next.
A facility is observed as active at the cited location.
SupportedThe facility is observed as closed while a linked certificate remains inconsistent.
ContradictedManagement question: Provide the dated site schedule, current operating confirmation, and authoritative licensure evidence for the affected facility.
The decision pack
Every material conclusion stays attached to its source, date, evidence status, and limitation.
Not a Quality of Earnings report. Not legal advice. Not confirmatory diligence. Talon is the decision infrastructure before those engagements—so your advisors enter with sharper questions, documented contradictions, and a prioritized Management Question Ledger.
An evidence-based posture—Continue, Continue with Conditions, Pause, or Stop—prepared for authorized human review.
The contradictions and unresolved facts that could alter the call.
The reconciled entities, facilities, owners, dates, and open identity questions.
The exact documents and answers needed from the target.
Ten standard tests
The goal is not a bigger data dump. It is a sharper decision before full diligence begins.
What exactly is the target?
Which entities, facilities, and owners belong to it?
Has the operating footprint actually changed?
What do available federal reports indicate?
Do reported capacity figures reconcile?
What do quality and patient-safety records show?
Do payer disclosures challenge the narrative?
Are sanctions, closures, or licensure events visible?
Which important claims cannot be verified?
What should management prove before you proceed?
Built for consequential calls
One target. One decision.
Use a fraction of the full diligence budget to decide where the rest is worth spending. Fixed scope. Five business days. No target-system access required.
Start your screen Healthcare-specific · Pre-LOI · Temporally reconciled · Evidence classified